The Association of Retinal Disease with Vision Impairment and Functional Status in Medicare Patients.

Background: The association of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) with functional status in the general Medicare population are not well established. Objectives: This study examined patient-reported survey data linked with Medicare claims to describe the burden of these vision-threatening retinal diseases (VTRDs) among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data linked with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data from 2006 to 2018 were used in a nationally representative retrospective pooled cross-sectional population-based comparison study. Outcomes between community-dwelling beneficiaries with nAMD (n = 1228), DME (n = 101), or RVO (n = 251) were compared with community-dwelling beneficiaries without any VTRDs (n = 104 088), controlling for baseline demographic and clinical differences. Beneficiaries with a diagnosis of nAMD, DME, or RVO during the data year were included; those with other VTRDs were excluded. Outcomes included vision function and loss, overall functioning as assessed by difficulties with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (iADLs), anxiety/depression, falls, and fractures. Results: In patient cohorts with nAMD, DME, and RVO, approximately one-third (34.2%-38.3%) reported "a little trouble seeing" (vs 28.3% for controls), and 26%, 17%, and 9%, respectively, reported "a lot of trouble seeing/blindness" (vs 5% of controls). Difficulty walking and doing heavy housework were the most reported ADLs and iADLs, respectively. Compared with those without VTRDs, beneficiaries with nAMD had higher odds of diagnosed vision loss (odds ratio [OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval, 4.06-7.16; P < .001) and difficulties with iADLs (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.80; P = .005); no differences were observed for DME or RVO vs control. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty status, comorbidities, and other relevant covariates, nAMD, DME, and RVO were not significantly associated with anxiety/depression, falls, or fractures. Discussion: Patients with nAMD or DME were more likely to report severe visual impairment than those without VTRDs, although only those with nAMD were more likely to be diagnosed with vision loss. Conclusions: Patients with nAMD continue to experience more vision impairment and worse functional status compared with a similar population of Medicare beneficiaries despite availability of therapies like antivascular endothelial growth factor to treat retinal disease.

Worsening of early DME after cataract surgery. The DICAT II Study report #2.

PURPOSE: To analyse the long anatomical and functional outcome of a subgroup of the DICAT II study cohort, consisting of 26 patients undergoing cataract surgery and withdrawn from the study for a clinically significant worsening of early diabetic macular edema (DME). MATERIALS: Patients who underwent cataract surgery and withdrawn from the DICAT II study for a clinically significant worsening of early DME with at least 12 months follow-up after the dropout. The study population was divided into two groups according to the clinical evaluation at one-year follow-up: ongoing treatment patients for DME (Treatment group, TG) and patients no longer treated (Non Treatment group, NTG). RESULTS: Central foveal thickness (CFT) at baseline and dropout time were higher in TG than in the NTG, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). In addition, TG patients reported a higher levels of glycated hemoglobin at time baseline compared to NTG patients (7.81 ± 1.15 vs 7.02 ± 0.56; p = 0.048). The linear regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between the visual acuity and the ongoing treatment group at one-year follow-up (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The study provides parameters to be considered when assessing the risk of developing persistent DME after cataract surgery in diabetic patients. In particular, CFT at baseline and dropout time have been reported to be an effective and predictable OCT biomarkers when evaluating DME progression. During the evaluation of the systemic disease, similar results were found for the glycated hemoglobin at baseline.

Six-Month Results of 577 nm Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Therapy in Non-center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy in patients with non-center involving diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 18 patients diagnosed with non-center involving DME were included in this prospective, observational study. The patient's baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), maximum retinal thickness (MRT), central macular thickness (CMT), and the area of macular exudates were determined and re-evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after laser treatment. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant change in BCVA at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months compared to the baseline in the follow-up (p=0.067, p=0.270, p=0.027 according to Bonferroni correction p<0,01). 1st, 3rd, and 6th month MRT was statistically significantly lower than baseline (p=0,009, p=0,006, p=0,007). No statistically significant change was detected in CMT at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months compared to the baseline in the follow-up (p=0.384, p=0.794, p=0.363). No statistically significant change in the area of macular exudates was detected at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months compared to the baseline (p=0.904, p=0.444, p=0.277). CONCLUSIONS: This study observed a significant decrease in extrafoveal retinal thickness in patients with DME. There was no progression to central macular involvement, an increase in the area of exudates, and a decrease in BCVA in any patient. SML may be an effective alternative to conventional argon laser in non-center involving DME.

Comparing the efficacy of glucocorticoids and anti-VEGF in treating diabetic macular edema: systematic review and comprehensive analysis.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to better understand the efficacy of various drugs, such as glucocorticoids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), and to evaluate various clinical treatment regimens consisting of different therapeutic measures. Methods: This study included randomized controlled trials up to February 2023 comparing the efficacy of corticosteroid-related therapy and anti-VEGF therapy. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched, and the quality of the studies was carefully assessed. Finally, 39 studies were included. Results: Results at 3-month followup showed that intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) + triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was the most beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of macular edema in the center of the retina in patients with DME. Results at 6-month follow-up showed that intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) was the most effective in improving patients' bestcorrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of central macular edema. Discussion: Overall, IVB+TA was beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing central macular edema thickness over a 3-month follow-up period, while DEX implants had a better therapeutic effect than anti-VEGF agents at 6 months, especially the patients with severe macular edema and visual acuity impaired. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=397100, identifier CRD42023397100.

Rate and Predictors of Misclassification of Active Diabetic Macular Edema as Detected by an Automated Retinal Image Analysis System.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work is to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rate of an automated retinal image analysis system (ARIAS) in diagnosing active diabetic macular edema (DME) and to identify factors associated with true and false positives. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of prospectively enrolled patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) referred to a tertiary medical retina center for screening or management of DME. All patients underwent two-field fundus photography (macula- and disc-centered) with a true-color confocal camera; images were processed by EyeArt V.2.1.0 (Woodland Hills, CA, USA). Active DME was defined as the presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Sensitivity and specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Variables associated with true (i.e., DME labeled as present by ARIAS + fluid on SD-OCT) and false positives (i.e., DME labeled as present by ARIAS + no fluid on SD-OCT) of active DME were explored. RESULTS: A total of 298 eyes were included; 92 eyes (31%) had active DME. ARIAS sensitivity and specificity were 82.61% (95% CI 72.37-89.60) and 84.47% (95% CI 78.34-89.10). The misclassification rate was 16%. Factors associated with true positives included younger age (p = 0.01), shorter DM duration (p = 0.006), presence of hard exudates (p = 0.005), and microaneurysms (p = 0.002). Factors associated with false positives included longer DM duration (p = 0.01), worse diabetic retinopathy severity (p = 0.008), history of inactivated DME (p < 0.001), and presence of hard exudates (p < 0.001), microaneurysms (p < 0.001), or epiretinal membrane (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of ARIAS was diminished in older patients and those without DME-related fundus lesions, while the specificity was reduced in cases with a history of inactivated DME. ARIAS performed well in screening for naïve DME but is not effective in surveillance inactivated DME.

Characterization of central-involved diabetic macular edema using OCT and OCTA.

PURPOSE: To characterize the occurrence of diabetic macular edema and the presence of abnormal retinal fluid accumulation in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). METHODS: In this two-year prospective study, a total of 122 eyes with diabetes type 2 underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-Angiography in association with OCT-Fluid imaging, a novel algorithm of OCT analysis allowing quantification of abnormal accumulation of fluid in the retina through low optical reflectivity ratios (LOR). Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grading for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity assessment was performed using 7-field color fundus photography. Best corrected visual acuity was also recorded. RESULTS: During the 2-year follow-up, 23 eyes (19%) developed central-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and 2 eyes (2%) developed clinically significant macular edema (CSME). In the two-year period of the study, eyes that developed CI-DME showed a progressive increase in central retinal thickness (CRT) (ß = 7.7 ± 2.1 µm/year, p < 0.001) and in LOR values (ß = 0.009 ± 0.004 ratio/year, p = 0.027). The increase in CRT and abnormal retinal fluid, represented by increased LOR ratios, are associated with increased retinal perfusion in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) (skeletonized vessel density, p = 0.039). In contrast, the eyes with CSME showed decreased retinal perfusion and abnormal fluid located in the outer layers of the retina. CONCLUSIONS: CI-DME and CSME appear to represent different entities. Eyes with CI-DME show increases in abnormal retinal fluid associated with increased retinal vascular perfusion in the DCP. Eyes with CSME are apparently associated with decreased retinal vascular perfusion in the DCP and abnormal fluid in the outer retina.

Microvascular changes following photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Standardized measurements are needed to obtain reliable data, therefore the aim of this letter is to clarify some points concerning chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

ESASO classification relevance in the diagnosis and evolution in diabetic macular edema patients after dexamethasone implant treatment.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical relevance of The European School for Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology (ESASO) classification in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after their first dexamethasone implant (DEXI) treatment. METHODS: Retrospective real-world study conducted on consecutive DME patients who underwent DEXI treatment and were controlled at month-2. Subjects were initially classified according to the ESASO classification stages. The outcomes were anatomical biomarkers with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were classified according to ESASO classification stages as early (7; 5.5%), advanced (100; 78.1%), and severe (21; 16.4%). At baseline, there were significant differences between stages in BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), and tomography anatomical biomarkers (p < 0.05). Initial BCVA (logMAR) was 0.33 ± 0.10, 0.58 ± 0.34, and 0.71 ± 0.35 in the early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively (p < 0.05). At month-2, BCVA was 0.17 ± 0.15, 0.46 ± 0.29, and 0.69 ± 0.27 in those classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively. At month-2, DME was resolved or improved in 6 (85.7%), 60 (60%), and 12 (60%) patients classified as early, advanced, and severe stages, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a good correlation between BCVA and ESASO classification stages. Patients in the severe stage did not achieve visual acuity improvement over the study period.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Subconjunctival Injection as Stand-alone Inflammation Prophylaxis after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of a single injection of subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide (TA) to postoperative topical prednisolone acetate (PA) with and without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for cataract surgery prophylaxis DESIGN: Retrospective comparative effectiveness cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2018 through 2021 INTERVENTION: Anti-inflammatory prophylaxis exposure groups included topical PA with or without NSAID, and subconjunctival injection of TA (Kenalog®) 10 mg/mL or 40 mg/mL in low (1.0 - 3.0 mg) or high dose (3.1 - 5.0 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association of postoperative macular edema (ME) and iritis diagnoses 15 to 120 days following surgery (effectiveness measures) and a glaucoma-related event (safety measure) between 15 days to 1 year after surgery RESULTS: Of 69,832 eligible patient-eyes, postop ME, iritis, and a glaucoma-related event occurred, on average in 1.3%, 0.8% and 3.4% in the topical groups and 0.9%, 0.5% and 2.8% in the injection groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, all injection groups had a trend of a lower OR of ME compared with the topical PA reference group, with the high dose TA 10 mg/mL group reaching statistical significance (OR 0.64, CI 0.43,0.97, P=0.033). The PA + NSAID group had higher odds (OR 0.88, CI 0.74,1.04, P =0.135). There was a trend of lower odds of a postop iritis diagnosis in the high strength (40 mg/mL) groups. For postop glaucoma-related events, compared with PA, the TA 10 mg/mL low dose group had lower odds (OR 0.69, CI 0.55,0.86, P=0.001), the TA 10 mg/mL high dose group had similar odds (OR 0.90, CI 0.70,1.15, P=0.40) and the TA 40 mg/mL low and high dose groups had higher odds (OR 1.46, CI 0.98,2.18, P=0.062), (OR 2.14, CI 1.36,3.37, P=0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TA 10 mg/mL high dose group, with an average dose of 4 mg, was associated with lower risk of postop macular edema and a similar risk of a glaucoma-related event compared with the topical groups.

Association between the response of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection and systemic factors of diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effects of systemic factors in response to intravitreal injections in patients with macular edema due to non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with intravitreal injections for macular edema secondary to NPDR between January 2018 and January 2021. The patients were divided into three groups according to the injection response. When patients with diabetic macular edema showed 20µ or more reduction in central retinal thickness compared to baseline, they were classified as responsive group, and if not, they were classified as refractory group. The responsive group was further divided into the complete and incomplete response groups. Patients with complete disappearance of edema at seven months were classified as the complete response group, whereas those in which edema did not disappear were classified as the incomplete response group. The clinical characteristics of each group, including medical history, ophthalmic examination results, and laboratory examination results at the time of diagnosis, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 112 eyes (91 patients) that satisfied the inclusion criteria, 89 (77 patients) in the responsive group and 23 (14 patients) in the refractory group were included in the analysis. The responsive group was further divided into the complete (51 eyes) and incomplete (38 eyes) response groups. The refractory group had significantly higher glycated hemoglobin levels and significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rates than the responsive group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.012, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, both factors were found to be significant in predicting the degree of response (all p < 0.05). No factor showed a significant difference between the incomplete and complete response groups(all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In macular edema caused by NPDR, low glomerular filtration rates and high glycated hemoglobin levels may be used as predictors of poor response to intravitreal injection therapy. In addition to blood glucose control, education should be provided regarding the need for the continuous monitoring of renal function.

Patterns of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for chorioretinal vascular diseases: Analysis of a nationwide claims database in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is currently considered the first-line treatment for chorioretinal vascular diseases in Japan, information regarding its treatment pattern is scarce. This study investigated the patterns of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for chorioretinal vascular diseases. METHODS: A health insurance claims database from acute care hospitals was used to estimate treatment intervals and continuation and drop-out rates regarding the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Patients aged ≥50 years diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration or aged ≥18 years diagnosed with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were included for 76,535, 49,704, and 37,681 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion, respectively; exactly 8,111, 2,283, and 6,896 received the treatment, respectively. The mean and median interval ranges during the maintenance phase by treatment initiation year were 94-100 and 73-80, 111-120 and 98-102, and 97-103 and 87-93 days for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion, respectively, without any trend over time. A tendency to increase the treatment continuation rate was indicated in later years by Kaplan-Meier curves. The drop-out rate in the treatment initiation year (2016) was 32% from 63% (2009), 53% from 69% (2014), and 36% from 47% (2013) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For all these diseases, the treatment intervals did not change remarkably, and a tendency toward improved treatment continuation was suggested.

Machine learning and optical coherence tomography-derived radiomics analysis to predict persistent diabetic macular edema in patients undergoing anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss in patients with diabetes. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an OCT-omics prediction model for assessing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment response in patients with DME. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 113 eyes from 82 patients with DME was conducted. Comprehensive feature engineering was applied to clinical and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) classifiers were trained using a training set of 79 eyes, and evaluated on a test set of 34 eyes. Clinical implications of the OCT-omics prediction model were assessed by decision curve analysis. Performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: The logistic, SVM, and BPNN classifiers demonstrated robust discriminative abilities in both the training and test sets. In the training set, the logistic classifier achieved a sensitivity of 0.904, specificity of 0.741, F1 score of 0.887, and AUC of 0.910. The SVM classifier showed a sensitivity of 0.923, specificity of 0.667, F1 score of 0.881, and AUC of 0.897. The BPNN classifier exhibited a sensitivity of 0.962, specificity of 0.926, F1 score of 0.962, and AUC of 0.982. Similar discriminative capabilities were maintained in the test set. The OCT-omics scores were significantly higher in the non-persistent DME group than in the persistent DME group (p < 0.001). OCT-omics scores were also positively correlated with the rate of decline in central subfield thickness after treatment (Pearson's R = 0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The developed OCT-omics model accurately assesses anti-VEGF treatment response in DME patients. The model's robust performance and clinical implications highlight its utility as a non-invasive tool for personalized treatment prediction and retinal pathology assessment.

Impact of GLP-1 Agonists and SGLT-2 Inhibitors on Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: An Aggregated Electronic Health Record Data Study.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of GLP-1 agonists compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study using TriNetX (Cambridge, MA, USA), a federated electronic health records network comprising multiple healthcare organizations. METHODS: Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and monotherapy treatment, excluding insulin, with GLP-1 agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors. Patients with history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy prior to initiation of treatment were excluded. Rate of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy and rate of development of diabetic macular edema were compared between patients on GLP-1 agonists compared to those on SGLT-2 inhibitors. The groups were propensity score matched for age, gender, ethnicity, race, type of diabetes, and severity of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Main outcomes included rate and relative risk of progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy and risk of diabetic macular edema in the GLP-1 agonist group versus the SGLT-2 inhibitor group. RESULTS: A total of 6481 patients were identified in the GLP-1 cohort and the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort after propensity score matching. At 1 year and 3 years after initiation of therapy, a higher rate of progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy was noted (RR: 1.26, CI 1.04-1.51, p=0.017 at 1 year, RR: 1.284, CI 1.1-1.499, p=0.002 at 3 years) in the GLP-1 agonist cohort compared to the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort. There was a higher rate of diabetic macular edema noted at 3 months (RR: 1.192, CI 1.059-1.276, p=0.002), 6 months (RR: 1.22, CI 1.13-1.32, p<0.001), 1 year (RR: 1.24, CI 1.15-1.33, p<0.001), and at 3 years (RR: 1.29, CI 1.21-1.38, p<0.001) in the GLP-1 agonist cohort compared to the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A higher rate of progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and risk of new-onset diabetic macular edema was observed in patients on monotherapy with GLP-1 agonists compared to those on SGLT-2 inhibitors. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these potential effects and to consider the current retinopathy status when initiating treatment with newer hypoglycemic agents to ensure these patients are appropriately monitored for developing potential vision threatening complications.

Combination Therapy with Anti-VEGF and Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab alone or ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. STUDY DESIGN: A single center, case-controlled, prospective cohort study (Clinical Trail Registration Number: ChiCTR2400080048). METHODS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled and randomized into the ranibizumab group (n = 23) and the combination group (ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone intravitreal implant) (n = 21). All patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injections in the first three months as the initial treatment. For the ranibizumab group, patients might receive repeat injections in case of the recurrence of macular edema; For the combination group, patients received an intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant after the first injection of ranibizumab at the day 15. The main outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction of central macular thickness. The secondary outcome were the numbers of recurrence, the average injection interval, and the numbers of injection. Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: The BCVAs in both groups were significantly improved compared with the baselines (all p < 0.001), but more increment in BCVA was noticed at the 3-month in the combination group (p = 0.022). Both groups showed a reduction of central macular thickness at all time points (p < 0.05). However, the combination group did not exhibit higher central macular thickness-reducing effects than the ranibizumab group (p > 0.05). Compared with the combination group, the ranibizumab group suffered a higher number of recurrences of macular edema (p < 0.001), a lower interval of injection (p = 0.050), and a higher number of injection (p < 0.011). The incidence of adverse events was not significant between the two groups (p = 0.944). CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone injection sustainably improved the BCVA of retinal vein occlusion patients with a good safety profile.

Aflibercept combined with triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography.

AIM: To analyze the relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) imaging in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who are treated with a combination of aflibercept and triamcinolone acetonide (TA). METHODS: A total of 76 eyes newly diagnosed DME were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to receive either aflibercept or a combination of aflibercept and TA. Injections once a month for a total of three injections. Central macular thickness (CMT), number of hyperreflective foci (HRF), height of subretinal fluid (SRF), and area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were evaluated using OCT and OCTA at baseline and after each monthly treatment. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction in macular edema after treatment, and the difference in BCVA between the two groups was statistically significant after each treatment (P<0.05). The difference in CMT between the two groups was statistically significant after the first two injections (P<0.01), but not after the third injection (P=0.875). The number of HRF (1mo: 7.41±8.25 vs 10.86±7.22, P=0.027; 2mo: 5.33±6.13 vs 9.12±8.61, P=0.034; 3mo: 3.58±3.00 vs 6.37±5.97, P=0.007) and height of SRF (1mo: 82.39±39.12 vs 105.77±42.26 µm, P=0.011; 2mo: 36.84±10.02 vs 83.59±37.78 µm, P<0.01; 3mo: 11.57±3.29 vs 45.43±12.60 µm, P<0.01) in combined group were statistically significant less than aflibercept group after each injection, while the area of FAZ showed no significant change before and after treatment in both groups. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy of aflibercept and TA shows more significant effects on DME eyes with decreased HRF and SRF. However, both aflibercept and combination therapy show no significant change in the area of FAZ.

Effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes: a Meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO were comprehensively searched for studies comparing vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes with DME. Clinical outcomes of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), the mean number of intravitreal injection and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Six studies involving 641 eyes were included. Final visual gain significantly improved and CMT significantly reduced in vitrectomized eyes at 6mo and 12mo visits (P<0.05). Although the mean reduction in CMT among non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly greater than in vitrectomized eyes at the 6mo [mean difference (MD)=53.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 28.03 to 78.72, P<0.0001] and 12mo (MD=49.65, 95%CI: 19.58 to 79.72, P=0.01), no significant difference was detected in improvement in BCVA at either 6mo (MD=0.05, 95%CI: -0.02 to 0.13, P=0.14) or 12mo (MD=0.03, 95%CI: -0.04 to 0.09, P=0.43). Injection number of ranibizumab in non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly less than that in vitrectomized eyes during 6-month period (MD=0.60, 95%CI: 0.16 to 1.04, P=0.008), while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups during 12mo of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Evidence from current study suggests that IVR was useful for both vitrectomized group and non-vitrectomized group with DME. Although less reduction in macular thickness is found in vitrectomized group, visual improvement between two groups is similar.

One-year anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema based on treatment intensity: Data from the FRB! registry.

PURPOSE: To compare one-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based on the proportion of visits where intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor injections were delivered. DESIGN: Cohort study PARTICIPANTS: There were 2288 treatment-naïve eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy from 31 October 2015 to 31 October 2021 from the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry. METHODS: Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n=1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n=1116). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean visual acuity (VA) change after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment was 3.6 (2.8, 4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4, 5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (p=0.005). The mean (95% CI) central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76, -61) µm and -85 (-92, -78) µm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (p=0.002). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the number of injections received over 12 months of treatment and the change in VA (p<0.001). Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a moderately greater CST reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This registry analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.

Real-World Evidence of the Long-Term Effectiveness of 0.2 µg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Persistent and Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema - A Single Center Study.

Purpose: To report the long-term functional, anatomical and safety outcomes of 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide 0.19mg in patients with persistent or recurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Retrospective, observational, single-center study of patients with recurrent or persistent DME. All patients received 0.2 µg/day of fluocinolone acetonide 0.19mg, and data were collected at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 after implantation. Outcomes measured included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and safety outcomes. Results: A total of 28 eyes from 28 patients were included. The mean age was 66.5 years (95% CI 62.8-70.2) with a mean duration of DME of 8.8 years (95% CI 7.7-10.0). Only two eyes were phakic. Mean follow-up was 25.4 months (95% CI 21.2-29.6). Mean BCVA at baseline was 48.6 ETDRS letters (95% CI 41.3-55.8) and improved as early as month 1 of follow-up with a mean gain in BCVA of 7.8 (95% CI 4.3-11.3) ETDRS letters (p<0.001). Statistically significant improvements in BCVA were also observed at months 6, 12 and 24. At baseline, patients had a mean CMT of 530.5µm (95% CI 463.0-598.0), and a decrease in CMT was observed, starting at the first month of follow-up (mean CMT reduction of -170.5µm, 95% CI -223.8- -117.1; p<0.001). Statistically significant decreases in CMT were also observed at months 6, 12, 24, and 36, with the maximum decrease observed at month 12 (p<0.001). Mean IOP at baseline was 16.4mmHg (95% CI 15.3-17.5) and nine eyes (32.1%) had an IOP ≥21mmHg during follow-up. Conclusion: Our results support the effectiveness and safety profile of fluocinolone acetonide. Although additional long-term real-world evidence is required, fluocinolone acetonide may represent a safe strategy for daily, low-dose, sustained and localized release to the posterior segment of the eye, providing both functional and anatomical benefits in DME.

Treatment of Failure of Macular Hole Closure due to Post-Vitrectomy Macular Edema Using Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection: A Case Report.

Introduction: Post-vitrectomy cystoid macular edema (CME) can lead to failure of macular hole (MH) closure. We report 2 cases of failure of MH closure due to post-vitrectomy CME, which were successfully treated using sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection. Case Presentations: Case 1 involved a 72-year-old male patient with a Gass Stage 3 MH in the right eye. He underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), internal limiting membrane translocation, and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas injection with cataract surgery in his right eye. The MH did not close postoperatively; further, CME developed at the edge of the MH. Accordingly, the patient underwent an STTA injection. Approximately 2 weeks after the STTA injection, the CME disappeared and the MH closed, which has remained closed 1 year after PPV. Case 2 involved a 78-year-old female patient with Gass Stage 3 MH in the left eye. The patient underwent the same surgical procedure as that performed in case 1. Further, she presented with failure of MH closure caused by CME; therefore, an STTA injection was performed. Approximately 6 weeks after STTA injection, the CME disappeared and the MH closed; further, there was maintained improvement of best-corrected visual acuity for 6 months. Conclusions: STTA injection could be considered before reoperation in cases involving failure of MH closure due to postoperative CME.

Cystoid macular edema occurring after intracameral bimatoprost implantation.

PURPOSE: This case report aims to report the development of cystoid macular edema (CME) unilaterally following the administration of bimatoprost implant (Durysta) injections in both eyes for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). OBSERVATIONS: An 84-year-old female patient, previously diagnosed with POAG, underwent bimatoprost implant (Durysta) injections in both eyes, spaced one month apart. Subsequently, the patient experienced a gradual decline in visual acuity in her left eye attributed to the development of CME. The condition resolved following a treatment regimen involving topical dexamethasone and nepafenac. CONCLUSION: The use of bimatoprost implant may lead to the occurrence of CME. Ophthalmologists must vigilantly monitor patients post-implantation, especially if they exhibit visual symptoms or have risk factors for a CME.